Skip to main content
Главная страница » Football » Tolka Rovers (Republic of Ireland)

Tolka Rovers: Premier League of Ireland Squad, Achievements & Stats

Overview of Tolka Rovers

Tolka Rovers is a prominent football team based in Dublin, Ireland, competing in the League of Ireland Premier Division. Founded in 1936, the club has developed a strong reputation for its competitive spirit and community engagement. Managed by their current coach, the team plays with a focus on strategic formations and dynamic play.

Team History and Achievements

Tolka Rovers have a rich history marked by several notable achievements. The club has secured multiple league titles and cup victories, establishing itself as a formidable force in Irish football. Notable seasons include their championship wins and impressive league finishes that have cemented their status among the top teams in the league.

Current Squad and Key Players

The current squad boasts several key players who are pivotal to the team’s success. Among them are star forwards known for their goal-scoring prowess, skilled midfielders who control the tempo of the game, and reliable defenders who anchor the backline. These players consistently deliver top performances that contribute to the team’s overall strength.

Team Playing Style and Tactics

Tolka Rovers employ a tactical approach characterized by flexible formations, often switching between 4-4-2 and 4-3-3 setups depending on the match situation. Their strategy emphasizes ball possession, quick transitions, and exploiting opponent weaknesses. Strengths include disciplined defense and creative attacking plays, while weaknesses may involve vulnerability to counterattacks.

Interesting Facts and Unique Traits

The club is affectionately known by fans as “The Tolka Titans,” reflecting their strong presence in local football culture. They boast a passionate fanbase that supports them through thick and thin. Rivalries with nearby teams add an extra layer of excitement to matches, while traditions like pre-match rituals enhance the matchday experience.

Lists & Rankings of Players & Stats

  • Top Scorer: Player A – 15 goals this season (✅)
  • Most Assists: Player B – 10 assists (✅)
  • Average Goals per Match: 1.8 (💡)
  • Defensive Record: Conceding an average of 0.9 goals per match (❌)

Comparisons with Other Teams

Tolka Rovers are often compared to other top-tier teams in the Premier Division due to their consistent performance levels. While they share similarities in squad depth with some rivals, Tolka’s unique tactical flexibility gives them an edge in adapting to different opponents’ strategies.

Case Studies or Notable Matches

A breakthrough game for Tolka Rovers was their stunning victory against Dublin United last season, where they overturned a deficit with three goals in added time. This match is frequently cited as a testament to their resilience and ability to perform under pressure.

Statistic Last Season This Season
Total Wins 12 14
Total Draws 6 5
Total Losses 8 7
Average Goals Scored per Game 1.7 1.9
Average Goals Conceded per Game 1.0 0.9

Tips & Recommendations for Betting Analysis 🎰💡📊📈💰💸⚽️🏆🏅⚽️💲📈📊🎰💡💸💰⚽️🏆🏅💲💵📈😎😃😉😜😝😛☺️😁😂🤣😍❤️😘😗😙☺️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻♻

  • Analyze head-to-head records against upcoming opponents to identify patterns or trends.
  • Evaluate recent form by reviewing performance metrics over the past few matches.
  • Favor games where Tolka’s key players are starting; track player availability for optimal betting decisions.
  • Bet on over/under goals based on defensive records; consider opposing team’s attack strength too.
  • Leverage live odds changes during matches for strategic late bets when conditions favor Tolka.

“Tolka Rovers’ adaptability makes them unpredictable but also very exciting to watch,” says sports analyst John Doe.

Betting Pros & Cons ✅ ❌ 🎰 💡 ⭐ 🌟 ⭐ 🌟 ⭐ 🌟 ⭐ 🌟 ⭐ 🌟 ⭐ 🌟 ⭐ 🌟

  • Potential Betting Pros:
  • Their solid defense can lead to low-scoring draws or narrow wins (✅).
  • Frequent home victories provide favorable odds for home bets (✅).
  • Kick-off strategies often catch opponents off guard early in matches (✅).

</ul

  • Potential Betting Cons:
  • </ul

    • Inconsistent away performances might affect bet reliability (❌).
    • </ul

      • Injury-prone key players could impact game outcomes unexpectedly (❌).</l[0]: import os
        [1]: import numpy as np
        [2]: import pandas as pd
        [3]: from scipy.sparse import csr_matrix
        [4]: from scipy.sparse.linalg import svds

        [5]: def get_movielens_data():
        [6]: """
        [7]: Loads data from movielens.org.
        [8]: :return:
        [9]: users_df : dataframe containing user ids mapped to user names.
        [10]: movies_df : dataframe containing movie ids mapped to movie titles.
        [11]: ratings_df : dataframe containing ratings given by users on movies.
        [12]: """
        [13]: # Loading data files
        [14]: users_filename = 'users.dat'
        [15]: movies_filename = 'movies.dat'
        [16]: ratings_filename = 'ratings.dat'

        [17]: # Creating pandas dataframes out of these files
        [18]: col_names_users = ['user_id', 'gender', 'age', 'occupation', 'zip_code']
        [19]: users_df = pd.read_csv(users_filename,
        [20]: sep='::',
        [21]: header=None,
        [22]: names=col_names_users)

        [23]: col_names_movies = ['movie_id', 'title', 'genres']
        [24]: movies_df = pd.read_csv(movies_filename,
        [25]: sep='::',
        [26]: header=None,
        [27]: engine='python',
        [28]: names=col_names_movies)

        ***** Tag Data *****
        ID: 1
        description: This snippet loads data from movielens.org using pandas dataframes with
        specific column names and separators which can be non-trivial due to custom separators,
        headerless files, custom engines etc.
        start line: 14
        end line: 28
        dependencies:
        – type: Function
        name: get_movielens_data()
        start line: 5
        end line: 28
        context description: This function loads datasets related to users, movies, and ratings,
        which can be used for further analysis such as collaborative filtering or recommendation.
        algorithmic depth: 4
        algorithmic depth external: N
        obscurity: 3
        advanced coding concepts: 3
        interesting for students: 4
        self contained: Y

        ************
        ## Challenging aspects

        ### Challenging aspects in above code:

        1. **Data Parsing Nuances**: The code uses specific delimiters (`::`) which require careful handling when reading files using `pd.read_csv`. Any slight deviation or inconsistency in file formatting can cause parsing errors.

        2. **Handling Large Datasets**: Given that Movielens datasets can be quite large (millions of rows), efficient memory management becomes crucial.

        3. **Data Integrity**: Ensuring that all datasets align correctly by user IDs or movie IDs without missing entries can be challenging.

        4. **Engine Specification**: Using `engine='python'` indicates potential issues with default parsers which might not handle certain edge cases well.

        5. **Column Names Mapping**: Accurately mapping column names without any mismatches is essential since any error here will propagate through subsequent analyses.

        ### Extension:

        To extend this code beyond its current functionality:

        1. **Incremental Updates**: Handle scenarios where new data files are added dynamically while processing existing ones.

        2. **Cross-referencing Data**: Ensure that all user IDs present in ratings exist within users dataset and similarly all movie IDs exist within movies dataset.

        3. **Error Handling**: Implement robust error handling mechanisms for scenarios such as missing files or malformed lines within files.

        4. **Advanced Data Processing**: Introduce additional processing steps such as normalizing age groups into categories or extracting genres into separate columns from strings.

        ## Exercise

        ### Problem Statement:

        You are tasked with extending a function that loads datasets related to users, movies, and ratings from Movielens.org into Pandas DataFrames for further analysis such as collaborative filtering or recommendation systems.

        Given [SNIPPET], you need to implement additional functionalities:

        1. Modify `get_movielens_data` so it can handle incremental updates where new data files might be added dynamically during execution.

        – Assume new files follow similar naming conventions (`users_new.dat`, `movies_new.dat`, `ratings_new.dat`).
        – Merge these new datasets into existing ones if they appear during execution.

        2. Cross-reference all user IDs present in `ratings` with those available in `users` dataset ensuring no orphan records exist.

        – Similarly ensure all movie IDs present in `ratings` exist within `movies`.

        3. Implement robust error handling:

        – Handle missing files gracefully by logging appropriate warnings/errors.
        – Ensure malformed lines do not break execution but are logged appropriately.

        4. Perform advanced data processing:

        – Normalize age groups into categories (`18-24`, `25-34`, etc.) within the `users_df`.
        – Extract genres into separate columns within `movies_df`.

        ### Requirements:

        – Use Python standard libraries along with Pandas.
        – Ensure your implementation handles large datasets efficiently.
        – Include detailed comments explaining each step of your implementation.

        ## Solution

        python
        import pandas as pd
        import os

        def get_movielens_data():
        """
        Loads data from movielens.org incrementally if new data appears during execution,
        cross-references user/movie IDs across datasets ensuring no orphan records exist,
        handles errors gracefully including malformed lines/loggings,
        performs advanced preprocessing like normalizing age groups/categories
        & extracting genres into separate columns.

        :return:
        users_df : dataframe containing user ids mapped to user names after preprocessing.
        movies_df : dataframe containing movie ids mapped after preprocessing genre extraction.
        ratings_df : dataframe containing ratings given by users on movies after validation checks.
        """

        def read_file(filename):
        try:
        return pd.read_csv(filename,
        sep='::',
        header=None)
        except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Warning! File {filename} not found.")
        return None

        def merge_datasets(df_list):
        return pd.concat(df_list).drop_duplicates().reset_index(drop=True)

        # Initial file reads
        users_files = [f'users.dat'] + [f'users_{i}.dat' for i in range(1,100)]

        col_names_users = ['user_id', 'gender', 'age', 'occupation', 'zip_code']

        all_users_dfs = []

        for file_name in users_files:
        df = read_file(file_name)
        if df is not None:
        df.columns = col_names_users[:len(df.columns)]
        all_users_dfs.append(df)

        # Normalizing age groups into categories
        bins= [18,24,34,44,54,np.inf]
        labels= ['18-24','25-34','35-44','45-54','55+']
        df['age_group'] = pd.cut(df['age'], bins=bins , labels=labels)

        # Dropping original age column after normalization
        df.drop(columns=['age'], inplace=True)

        all_users_dfs.append(df)

        # Repeat similar logic for movies dataset

        movies_files = [f'movies.dat'] + [f'movies_{i}.dat' for i in range(1,100)]
        col_names_movies = ['movie_id', 'title', 'genres']
        all_movies_dfs=[]

        for file_name_moviesssssssnameeesssssdf_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen_ssseennnnnnngggggggggeeeeennnddddvvvveerrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiinnngggggggg__ffile_ffile_ffile_ffile_ffile_ffile_ffile_ffile_ffilenameeesssssdf_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_eeeeein_nnnnneeeeesstooonnsssssfile_ssssnamess_ffffffffffffff]

        # Extract genres into separate columns
        genre_col_list=['Action','Adventure','Animation','Children's','Comedy','Crime',
        "Documentary",'Drama','Fantasy',"Film-Noir",'Horror',"Musical",
        "Mystery","Romance","Sci-Fi","Thriller","War","Western"]

        ## Follow-up exercise

        ### Problem Statement:

        Building upon your previous implementation of loading Movielens datasets:

        1. Modify your function so it supports multi-threaded file reading operations ensuring thread safety while merging results incrementally.

        2.Add functionality allowing real-time monitoring of directories specified (`./data/users`, `./data/movies`, `./data/ratings`) so any newly added files during runtime are automatically processed without restarting the program.

        ### Requirements:

        – Use Python threading libraries along with Pandas efficiently managing threads synchronization issues while merging results incrementally ensuring thread safety throughout operation stages .

        ## Solution

        python

        import threading

        class RealTimeDataLoader(threading.Thread):

        def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.users_files_dir='./data/users'
        self.movies_files_dir='./data/movies'
        self.ratings_files_dir='./data/ratings'
        self.lock=threading.Lock()
        self.all_users_dfs=[]
        self.all_movies_dfs=[]
        self.all_ratings_dfs=[]

        def run(self):
        while True:
        with self.lock:
        # Read Users Files
        all_user_files=os.listdir(self.users_files_dir)
        for filename_user_file_in_all_user_files_in_os_listdir_of_self_users_file_dir_for_filename_user_file_in_all_user_files_in_os_listdir_of_self_users_file_dir:

        # Read Movies Files

        all_movie_files=os.listdir(self.movies_file_dir)

        for filename_movie_file_in_all_movie_files_in_os_listdir_of_self_movies_file_dir_for_filename_movie_file_in_all_movie_files_in_os_listdir_of_self_movies_file_dir:

        # Read Ratings Files

        all_ratings_fiels=os.listdir(self.ratings_fiels_dirs)

        for filename_rating_file_in_all_ratings_fiels_in_os_listdir_of_self_ratings_fiels_dirs_for_filename_rating_file_in_all_ratings_fiels_in_os_listdir_of_self_ratings_fiels_dirs:

        time.sleep(60)

        def main():
        rt_loader=RealTimeDataLoader()
        rt_loader.start()

        if __name__ == '__main__':
        main()

        *** Excerpt ***

        The use of child soldiers violates international law because children should not be participants directly involved at any level at conflict.[41] In addition children should not be exposed directly or indirectly towards armed conflicts.[42] Children should only participate indirectly at armed conflicts through humanitarian assistance.[43] Furthermore children should never take part at direct hostilities.[44] The use of child soldiers violates international law because it involves children directly at hostilities.[45] It is considered war crime under international criminal law.[46] Moreover it violates human rights laws because it deprives children’s right “to survival”.[47] It also violates human rights laws because it deprives children’s right “to develop”.[48]
        There are many arguments about why states recruit child soldiers despite violating international law prohibiting such practices.[49] First argument suggests that states recruit child soldiers because there is lack enforcement mechanisms internationally.[50] Second argument suggests that states recruit child soldiers because there is lack enforcement mechanisms domestically.[51] Third argument suggests that states recruit child soldiers because there is lack political will internationally.[52] Fourth argument suggests that states recruit child soldiers because there is lack political will domestically.[53]

        *** Revision 0 ***

        ## Plan

        To create an exercise that demands profound understanding alongside additional factual knowledge beyond what's presented in the excerpt requires enhancing both its complexity and depth regarding international law concerning child soldiers.

        Firstly, integrating more intricate legal terminologies related specifically to international humanitarian law would elevate its difficulty level significantly; this includes referencing specific conventions like The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) Article 38 which prohibits recruitment under fifteen years old into armed forces or groups participating actively in hostilities.

        Secondly introducing deductive reasoning elements would involve presenting hypothetical scenarios requiring interpretation based on nuances within international laws—this could involve distinguishing between active participation versus indirect support roles children might play within conflict zones under various legal frameworks globally.

        Lastly incorporating nested counterfactuals and conditionals would necessitate readers understanding not just what is stated but also implications under different circumstances—such as how changing one factor might alter legal interpretations or obligations under international law.

        ## Rewritten Excerpt

        "The deployment of minors within military operations contravenes established statutes under global jurisprudence primarily due to foundational principles asserting minors must remain detached from direct combat engagements irrespective of capacity—whether participatory or supportive—in armed disputes ([41]). Such principles emanate explicitly from comprehensive mandates enshrined within documents like The Convention on the Rights of Child Article 38 ([42]), underscoring prohibitions against conscripting individuals below fifteen years into militarized factions actively engaged therein ([43]). Direct involvement delineates unequivocal breaches under International Humanitarian Law ([44]), categorically constituting war crimes pursuant delineations outlined by International Criminal Law statutes ([45]). Additionally egregious violations manifest against human rights legislation through negation of fundamental entitlements intrinsic to minors—their inherent rights ‘to survival’ ([46]) juxtaposed against ‘to develop’ unimpeded ([47])—are thus egregiously compromised ([48]).

        Notwithstanding clear proscriptions against such practices internationally ratified norms exhibit lacunae pertaining chiefly towards enforcement efficacy both globally ([49]) & domestically ([50]), compounded further by discernible deficits pertaining political resolve at respective strata—international ([51]) & domestic domains alike ([52]). Consequently posits arise querying rationale behind state entities engaging minors contrary statutory prohibitions—a multifaceted discourse contemplating enforcement mechanism deficiencies alongside paucity political will across varied jurisdictions thereby facilitating continued recruitment practices despite explicit legal prohibitions ([53])."

        ## Suggested Exercise

        In light of The Convention on the Rights of Child Article 38 prohibition against recruiting individuals below fifteen years into military factions actively engaged therein juxtaposed against persistent recruitment practices observed globally,

        Which among following hypothetical amendments could theoretically strengthen enforcement mechanisms internationally without directly contravening sovereign state autonomy?

        A) Instituting mandatory universal jurisdiction over crimes involving recruitment below eighteen years old thereby obligating signatory states irrespective of territoriality principle adherence;

        B) Mandating compulsory inclusion clauses within bilateral trade agreements requiring signatory states enforce anti-child soldier statutes aligned strictly according to The Convention on Rights Child standards;

        C) Establishing an independent International Monitoring Body vested with powers exclusively observing compliance without direct intervention capabilities unless unanimously agreed upon sanctions imposed by UN Security Council members;

        D) Revising existing protocols under International Criminal Law statutes enabling automatic extradition requests filed against individuals accused regardless nationality involved parties hence bypassing traditional diplomatic immunity considerations.

        avourable position vis-a-vis Syria than Israel had been able ever since June $1967$. Yet Israel did not dare accept even this offer before Congress intervened decisively.”
        [^fnref9^][^fn9^] As we shall see later these reports were exaggerated.^{10} But even if they were true Israel would have been justified had she accepted them instead of risking her life blood at Suez Canal.^{11}

        [^fnref10^][^fn10^] See Appendix I below p$70.$[^fn11^][^fn11^]
        Israel’s prime minister Menachem Begin declared shortly after his arrival at Washington “I am convinced we shall win.”^{12} He was wrong but he won nevertheless!

        A few days before President Johnson made his decision he had written “I am very much worried about what seems likely next week.”^{13} It was indeed worrisome enough although President Johnson had every reason not only morally but also legally speaking^{14} – not to intervene militarily on the side of Israel.^{15}

        On October $17$ President Johnson announced his decision “to supply Israel with arms.”^{16} He also asked Congress “to authorize U.S.A., temporarily…to sell weapons…to Israel.”^{17}

        President Johnson explained his reasons thus:^{18}

        “Since October $6$ I have received repeated requests from Israeli officials asking me whether U.S.A., will assist Israel militarily if Egypt attacks her again…. My answer has been consistent – that we cannot make commitments prior either our own assessment has been completed…. That assessment has now been completed.”

        “Although my government has tried hard…we have failed completely…to bring about a cease-fire.”

        “On October $7$, two days ago,…the Egyptian Air Force launched heavy attacks deep inside Israeli territory…. At least ten Israeli cities were bombed…. Many civilians were killed…and scores wounded…. Today another wave began.”

        “Under these circumstances I felt compelled today,…after consulting my advisers,…to inform Mr Eshkol…that U.S.A., will supply Israel immediately…with arms necessary…for her self-defense.”

        “Because I believe it essential now…that both sides stop fighting…I have asked Congress today…authorizing sale temporarily…of arms sufficient…”^{19}

        But he did more than this.^{20} He decided “that U.S.A., must take immediate action herself”:^{21}

        “The fact remains…the whole area lies immediately adjacent our vital interests…”

        “Any threat directed toward our ally Jordan…would endanger stability Middle East…”

        “If Jordan falls…the entire area would become vulnerable Soviet penetration.”

        “Any attempt destroy Jordan must be met firmly…”

        “I have therefore ordered immediately delivery arms requested us earlier…and ordered urgent shipment ammunition…and ordered U.S.A., planes fly reconnaissance missions over Jordan.”

        President Johnson believed his action was necessary “not only national interest…but world interest.”^{22}

        This announcement was received enthusiastically both inside United States^{23} ^{}and abroad.^{24} On October $20$ President Johnson announced his intention “to send American troops Lebanon.”^{25}

        President Johnson was probably aware that his action meant war between United States ^{}and USSR.^{26} Yet he did not hesitate taking this step although he knew full well what consequences it might entail.^{27}

        It seems however unlikely President Johnson intended deliberately provoking Soviet Union.^{28} His action was rather dictated necessity – by need defend vital interests United States – and protect allies especially Jordan whose integrity he regarded indispensable condition peace Middle East.^{29}

        But whatever reasons induced him take these steps they were clearly justified both morally legally speaking.^{30}

        President Johnson acted wisely courageously decisively ably swiftly effectively – as he always did when occasion demanded.^{31}
        Yet even though he acted wisely courageously decisively ably swiftly effectively he failed achieve objective sought – restore peace Middle East permanently ––because others did not act likewise wisely courageously decisively ably swiftly effectively ––including himself later!^{32}

        Footnotes

        [^fnref1^][^fn_anchor_1^]{#fn}[http://www.history.com/topics/watergate](http://www.history.com/topics/watergate){#fnref}[↩](#fnref)

        [^fnref8^][^fn_anchor_8^]{#fn}[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal){#fnref}[↩](#fnref)

        [^fnref9^][^fn_anchor_9^]{#fn}[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War){#fnref}[↩](#fnref)

        [^fnref10^][^fn_anchor_10^]{#fn}{% endraw %}

        {% raw %}

        Answer Number Two:

        * * *

        #### THE STRATEGY OF DEFENSIVE WARFARE IN THE SIX DAY WAR OF JUNE-JULY $1967$

        By Mordechai Bar-On

        * * *

        The Israeli strategy adopted during June-July $1967$ constituted one major innovation compared with previous wars fought by Israel since her independence almost two decades earlier.

        * * *

        The Israelis employed two basic strategies before June-July $1967$. One strategy aimed at inflicting maximum damage upon enemy forces before being subjected themselves substantial damage; another strategy aimed at avoiding losses altogether.

        * * *

        This paper examines how these strategies were applied during previous wars fought by Israel up until June-July $1967$, why they failed then succeed respectively thereafter.

        * * *

        Israel fought four wars up until June-July $1967$: first Arab-Israel War ($1948$); second Arab-Israel War ($1956$); third Arab-Israel War ($1967$); fourth Arab-Israel War ($1973$).

        * * *

        In first Arab-Israel War ($1948$), Israelis employed offensive strategy aiming inflict maximum damage enemy forces before being subjected substantial damage themselves.

        * * *

        In second Arab-Israel War ($1956$), Israelis employed defensive strategy aiming avoid losses altogether.

        * * *

        In third Arab-Israel War ($1967$), Israelis employed combination offensive-defensive strategies aiming inflict maximum damage enemy forces before being subjected substantial damage themselves while avoiding losses altogether.

        * * *

        In fourth Arab-Israel War ($1973$), Israelis employed combination offensive-defensive strategies similar those used third Arab-Israel War except difference lay emphasis placed offensive vs defensive elements respectively.

        #### THE FIRST ARAB-ISRAEL WAR OF APRIL-$mathrm{underline{phantom {12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890}}}$ MAY-$mathrm{underline{phantom {12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890}}}$ $mathrm{underline{phantom {12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890}}}$$mathrm{underline{phantom {12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890}}}$$mathrm{underline{phantom {12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890}}}$ $mathrm{underline{phantom {12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890}}}$$mathrm{underline{phantom {123456789012345678901234567890}}}$$mathrm{{}!!!!!!!!!! begin{matrix}displaystyle \ displaystyle \ displaystyle \ end{matrix}}$$mathrm{{}!!!!! begin{matrix}displaystyle \ displaystyle \ displaystyle \ end{matrix}}$$mathrm{{}!! begin{matrix}displaystyle \ displaystyle \ end{matrix}}$

        Israeli leaders believed only way defeat Arabs rely heavily superior numbers equipment manpower secure borders vital interests statehood was launch surprise attack massive scale simultaneously strike five fronts Arabs concentrated overwhelming force initial hours war air power ground forces simultaneously crushing blow Arabs before being subjected counterattack themselves.

        #### THE SECOND ARAB-ISRAEL WAR OF OCTOBER-$mathrm{{}!{}{}{}!}$ NOVEMBER-$mathrm{{}!{}{}{}!}$ $mathrm{{}!{}{}!}$ $mathrm{{}!{}{}!}$ $mathbf{{}{}}$mathbf{$$mathbf{{}{}}$$${}${}${}${}${}${}${}${}${}${}${}$${}${}${}${}${}$${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{${}{$}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}{{}}}$}}$

        Israeli leaders believed only way defeat Egyptians rely heavily superior numbers equipment manpower secure borders vital interests statehood was launch surprise attack massive scale simultaneously strike two fronts Egyptians concentrated overwhelming force initial hours war air power ground forces simultaneously crushing blow Egyptians before being subjected counterattack themselves.

        #### THE THIRD ARAB-ISRAEL WAR OF JUNE-JULY $mathbf{{}_{186 }}$mathbf{$$mathbf{{}_{186 }}$$${}_${}_${}_${}_${}_${}_${}_${}_${}_{{{}}}_{{{}}}_{{{}}}$_$_$_$_$_$_$_$_{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}{}_{{{}}}_{{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}{$}$}}

        Israeli leaders believed only way defeat Syrians rely heavily superior numbers equipment manpower secure borders vital interests statehood was launch surprise attack massive scale simultaneously strike three fronts Syrians concentrated overwhelming force initial hours war air power ground forces simultaneously crushing blow Syrians before being subjected counterattack themselves.

        #### THE FOURTH ARAB-ISRAEL WAR OF OCTOBER-$mathbf{{}_{186 }}$mathbf{$$mathbf{{}_{186 }}$$${}_${}_${}_${_${}_${_$_}_{{$}_{186 }_{186 }_{186 }_{186 }_{186 }_{186 }_{186 }_{186 }}_$}

        Israeli leaders believed only way defeat Egyptians Syrians rely heavily superior numbers equipment manpower secure borders vital interests statehood was launch surprise attack massive scale simultaneously strike four fronts Egyptians Syrians concentrated overwhelming force initial hours war air power ground forces simultaneously crushing blow Egyptians Syrians before being subjected counterattack themselves.

        ### Conclusion

        The Israeli strategy adopted during June-July $1967$ constituted one major innovation compared previous wars fought Israel since independence almost two decades earlier.

        **Source:** Bar-On M., ‘The Strategy Defensive Warfare Six Day War’, Journal Strategic Studies Vol.$13$, No.$01$, March $1990$, pp.$65{-}79$. Available online via JSTOR:[https://www.jstor.org/stable/4280895?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents](https://www.jstor.org/stable/4280895?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents)

        Footnotes

        [^footnote_number_reference_link_formatting_help]^[](^)

        ### About this result

        This content was assembled from open access sources.

        ### Attribution

        This work is licensed under CC BY-SA

        ### Cite this page

        Bar-On M., ‘The Strategy Defensive Warfare Six Day War’, Journal Strategic Studies Vol.$13$, No.$01$, March $1990$, pp.$65{-}79$. Available online via JSTOR:[https://www.jstor.org/stable/4280895?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents](https://www.jstor.org/stable/4280895?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents)

        {% endraw %}

        [{% raw %}

        Answer Number Three:

        {% endraw %}

        {% raw %}

        I don’t know how you came up with this question…but I think you’re looking more at politics than history here…

        However…

        The US didn’t want Egypt/Syria/Gaza taken over…they wanted peace talks…which were happening just prior…but Egypt/Syria started mobilising troops near Gaza/Egyptian border…

        That’s why US warned Egypt/Syria…

        As far as helping out…US didn’t want anything going down…and if they did…they’d help out whoever needed help…

        But I don’t think anyone expected things go down like they did…

        For more information check out Wikipedia’s page here:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Day_War](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Day_War)

        GrahamZaibatsu(GrahamZaibatsu)(Ask Question Feedbin ♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪♪→→→→→→→→→→→↪)
        Sources:
        [Six Day War | History Channel Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia](http://historychannel.fandom.com/wiki/Six_Day_War)
        [Six-Day-War | Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day-War)
        [Six-Day-War | Military Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia](http://military.fandom.com/wiki/Six-Day-War)
        [Suez Crisis | Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_Crisis)
        [Suez Crisis | History Channel Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia](http://historychannel.fandom.com/wiki/Suez_Crisis)

        Posted   United States  United States


        {% endraw %}

        [{% raw %}

        Answer Number Four:

        {% endraw %}

        {% raw %}

        I am assuming you mean “why did America support Israel?” rather than “why did America help Israel?” because otherwise it wouldn’t make sense…

        I’ll give you my opinion…

        I believe America supported Israel simply because America sees itself as a democracy fighting against dictatorships…

        If you look around today there aren’t many democracies left…

        To me personally America saw supporting democracies fighting dictatorships as something good…

        I guess America thought supporting democracies fighting dictatorships would eventually lead somewhere good…

        I don’t know how much truth there really is behind my theory though…


        **Source(s):**

        *[Wikipedia article about Six Day War ](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Day_War)*

        Posted <time datetime="2015-09-05T03:40:37+0000" title ="September