Skip to main content
Главная страница » Tennis » Dellavedova, Matthew vs Overbeck, Carl Emil

Dellavedova, Matthew vs Overbeck, Carl Emil

Expert Opinion on Dellavedova vs. Overbeck Tennis Match

The upcoming match between Matthew Dellavedova and Carl Emil Overbeck is poised to be an intriguing encounter. With both players bringing their unique styles to the court, the betting odds offer a glimpse into potential outcomes.

Dellavedova, Matthew

L
-

Overbeck, Carl Emil

W
Date: 2025-11-25
Time: 07:10
(FT)
Venue: Playford - COURT 1
Score: 1-2

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Over 1st Set Games66.80%(1-2) 6-3 1st Set 1.40
Under 1st Set Games63.90%(1-2) 6-3 1st Set 1.67
Tie Break in 1st Set (No)86.50%(1-2)
Under 2.5 Sets81.70%(1-2)
Tie Break in Match (No)76.20%(1-2)
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22)64.00%(1-2)
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5)53.40%(1-2)

Betting Predictions Analysis

First Set Games

The odds suggest a close contest in the first set, with a slight lean towards having over 6.5 games at 66.50. This indicates expectations of a competitive start, possibly extending into longer rallies or exchanges.

Tie Break in First Set

There is a strong probability (82.50) that the first set will not require a tiebreak, hinting at decisive set wins by either player without needing extra play.

Total Sets Played

The prediction for fewer than 2.5 sets stands at 81.10, suggesting that one player might dominate early on, leading to a quick resolution of the match.

Tie Break in Match

The likelihood of no tiebreak occurring in the entire match is significant at 74.90, indicating expectations of clear victories within regular sets.

Total Games Prediction

  • Under 22 Games (3-Way): The odds are set at 63.10 for fewer than 22 total games being played, which aligns with predictions of swift sets.
  • Under 22.5 Games (2-Way): At 56.30, this suggests an even more rapid conclusion to the match than previously mentioned predictions.

In summary, the data points towards a match that could conclude swiftly with decisive set wins and minimal need for tiebreaks.