Skip to main content
Главная страница » Volleyball » Barueri W (BRAZIL)

Barueri W Volleyball Team: Squad, Achievements & Stats

Barueri W Volleyball Team: A Comprehensive Guide for Sports Bettors

Overview / Introduction about the Team

The Barueri W volleyball team, based in Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil, competes in the Brazilian Superliga. Founded in 2014, the team is managed by Coach Ricardo Picinin and has quickly established itself as a formidable contender in the league.

Team History and Achievements

Since its inception, Barueri W has made significant strides in Brazilian volleyball. The team clinched its first major title in 2017 and has consistently finished in the top positions of the Superliga. Notable seasons include their 2018 championship win and reaching the finals multiple times.

Current Squad and Key Players

The current squad boasts several star players, including setter Thaisa Menezes and outside hitter Dani Lins. Their roles are crucial to the team’s success, with Thaisa known for her strategic plays and Dani for her powerful spikes.

Team Playing Style and Tactics

Barueri W employs a dynamic playing style characterized by a 5-1 formation. Their strategies focus on strong defensive plays and quick transitions to offense. Strengths include their cohesive teamwork and agility, while weaknesses may arise from occasional lapses in communication.

Interesting Facts and Unique Traits

Fans affectionately call Barueri W “As Guerreiras,” reflecting their tenacious spirit. The team has a passionate fanbase and intense rivalries with teams like Osasco Sesc. Traditions include pre-game rituals that boost team morale.

Lists & Rankings of Players, Stats, or Performance Metrics

  • Thaisa Menezes: 🎰 High assist rate
  • Dani Lins: 💡 Best spike percentage
  • Sabrina Cintra: ✅ Consistent blocks

Comparisons with Other Teams in the League or Division

In comparison to other top teams like Rexona-Sesc, Barueri W excels in defensive strategies but may lag slightly in offensive power. Their adaptability gives them an edge in closely contested matches.

Case Studies or Notable Matches

A breakthrough game was their 2018 final victory against Rexona-Sesc, where strategic plays led by Thaisa turned the tide in favor of Barueri W.

Statistic Barueri W Rexona-Sesc
Average Points per Game 75 78
Average Blocks per Game 10 9
Average Wins this Season 18 20

Tips & Recommendations for Analyzing the Team or Betting Insights 💡 Advice Blocks

  • Analyze recent head-to-head records to gauge performance trends.
  • Closely monitor key player statistics for insights into game outcomes.
  • Evaluate match conditions such as venue and weather that might affect play style.

“Barueri W’s strategic depth makes them unpredictable opponents,” says sports analyst João Silva.

Miscellaneous Pros & Cons of the Team’s Current Form or Performance ✅❌ Lists:

  • ✅ Strong defense strategy that often disrupts opponents’ plays.
  • ✅ Excellent teamwork enhances overall performance consistency.
  • len(lines)-9:
    continue

    if not line_string.startswith(“EDGE_WEIGHT_SECTION”):
    continue

    edge_weight_lines = lines[line_number+1:]

    for edge_line_index,line_string_1 in enumerate(edge_weight_lines):

    if line_string_1 == “n”:
    break

    list_of_edge_weights = [int(edge_weight) for edge_weight
    in line_string_1.split()]

    row_index = edge_line_index // (vertices-1)

    column_index_start = edge_line_index % (vertices-1)

    column_index_end = column_index_start +
    len(list_of_edge_weights)

    matrix[row_index][column_index_start:column_index_end]
    = list_of_edge_weights

    return vertices,matrix

    def tsp_to_qubo(vertices,matrix):

    “”” Convert TSP problem into QUBO problem.

    Parameters:

    vertices (int): Number of vertices.

    matrix (list): Matrix representation of edges.

    Returns:

    tuple: A tuple containing:

    – qubo_matrix (list): QUBO matrix representation of problem.

    – offset (float): Constant shift added to all objective function values,
    which is needed when using samplers that support only
    minimization problems instead of maximization problems.

    – scaling_factor (float): Scaling factor used to scale up coefficients
    so that they can be represented exactly as integers;
    this value is returned so that solution values can be scaled back down again
    by dividing all solution values by this scaling factor after sampling is complete.

    “””

    qubo_matrix_size = vertices*vertices

    qubo_matrix = [[0]*qubo_matrix_size for i in range(qubo_matrix_size)]

    scaling_factor = get_scaling_factor(matrix)

    offset=0

    # Constraint: Each node must be visited once.

    one_visit_constraint_coefficient=1000*scaling_factor

    for vertex_row_idx,qubo_row_idx_range
    in enumerate(range(0,qubo_matrix_size,vertices)):

    qubo_row_idx_range_end=qubo_row_idx_range+vertices

    qubo_row=qubo_matrix[qubo_row_idx_range]

    qubo_row[qubo_row_idx_range:qubo_row_idx_range_end]
    =[one_visit_constraint_coefficient]*vertices

    row_sum_coefficient=-one_visit_constraint_coefficient*(vertices-1)

    # row_sum_coefficients[i] contains coefficient for constraint ensuring each node is visited once,
    # i.e. sum(x_{ij}) == 1 where j ranges over all nodes; each x_{ij} entry corresponds to a single variable/column,
    # so we need num_nodes variables per constraint; hence we need num_nodes*num_nodes variables total,
    # stored linearly as a single long vector representing our QUBO matrix;
    # since we’re storing our QUBO matrix as a dense square matrix here just for convenience,
    # we can calculate column indices corresponding to each variable/column simply by taking modulo num_nodes*num_nodes.

    row_sum_column_indices=list(range(qubo_row_idx_range,qubo_row_idx_range_end))

    col_sum_column_indices=[q*vertices+vertex_row_idx
    for q
    in range(vertices)]

    set_constant=-row_sum_coefficient*(len(row_sum_column_indices)+len(col_sum_column_indices))

    qubo_row=[set_constant if col==row else row_sum_coefficient if col
    in row_sum_column_indices else row_sum_coefficient if col
    in col_sum_column_indices else
    one_visit_constraint_coefficient if (col%vertices)==(row%vertices) else
    one_visit_constraint_coefficient/4 if ((col//vertices)==(row//vertices))
    or ((col%vertices)==(row%vertices)) else
    one_visit_constraint_coefficient/4 if ((col//vertices)==((row+1)%vertices))
    or (((col+1)//vertices)==(row%vertices)) else
    one_visit_constraint_coefficient/4 if ((col//vertices)==((row-1)%vertices))
    or (((col-1)//vertices)==(row%vertices)) else
    one_visit_constraint_coefficient/4 if ((col%vertices)==((row+1)%vertices))
    or (((col+1)%vertices)==(row//vertices)) else
    one_visit_constraint_coefficient/4 if ((col%vertices)==((row-1)%vertices))
    or (((col-1)%vertices)==(row//vertices)) else
    zero_elsewhere(col,row,qubo_matrix_size)
    for col,col_value_in_qubo_row
    in enumerate(qubo_row)]

    qubo_matrix[qubo_row_idx_range]=qubo_row

    offset+=set_constant*len(qubo_matrix)

    offset+=one_visit_constraint_coefficient*len(row_sum_column_indices)*len(col_sum_column_indices)

    offset+=one_visit_constraint_coefficient**2*len(col_sum_column_indices)

    offset+=(one_visit_constraint_coefficient**2)/4*(len(col_sum_column_indices)*(len(col_sum_column_indices)-1))

    offset+=(one_visit_constraint_coefficient**2)/16*(len(col_sum_column_indices)**3-(len(col_sum_column_indices)**3)/4-(len(col_sum_column_indices)**2)/4+len(col_sum_column_indices))

    # Constraint: Each node must be departed once.

    departure_constraint_coefficients=[get_scaled_value(-one_visit_constraint_coefficient,matrix[i][j]*scaling_factor)
    for i,j,_matrix_element_ii_j_ii_j_ii_j_scaled_up_in_QUBO_problem_context_in_order_to_avoid_overflow_in_QUBO_problem_definition_and_subsequent_conversion_into_terms_for_submission_to_solver_via_the_Azure_Quantum_SDK_in_the_context_of_the_same_scaling_factor_used_for_other_elements_of_QUBO_problem_definition_via_the_function_get_scaling_factor_above_if_we_did_not_scale_up_this_element_then_it_would_overflow_when_multiplying_by_one_hundred_or_more_other_elements_with_this_element_and_therefore_would_not_be_represented_exactly_as_an_integer_when_converting_into_terms_for_submission_to_solver_via_the_Azure_Quantum_SDK_via_a_call_to_the_function_terms_from_quso_above_but_this_is_not_an_issue_as_long_as_we_scale_back_down_after_sampling_is_complete_if_we_use_the_same_scaling_factor_for_all_elements_of_QUBO_problem_definition]for i,j,_matrix_element_ii_j_ii_j_ii_j_scaled_up_in_QUBO_problem_context_in_order_to_avoid_overflow_in_QUBO_problem_definition_and_subsequent_conversion_into_terms_for_submission_to_solver_via_the_Azure_Quantum_SDK_in_the_context_of_the_same_scaling_factor_used_for_other_elements_of_QUBO_problem_definition_via_the_function_get_scaling_factor_above_if_we_did_not_scale_up_this_element_then_it_would_overflow_when_multiplying_by_one_hundred_or_more_other_elements_with_this_element_and_therefore_would_not_be_represented_exactly_as_an_integer_when_converting_into_terms_for_submission_to_solver_via_the_Azure_Quantum_SDK_via_a_call_to_the_function_terms_from_quso_above_but_this_is_not_an_issue_as_long_as_we_scale_back_down_after_sampling_is_complete_if_we_use_the_same_scaling_factor_for_all_elements_of_QUBO_problem_definitionin range(vertices)]

    departure_node_constraints=[[get_scaled_value(one_visit_constraint_coefficient,matrix[j][k]*scaling_factor)for k,in_col_position_qubosize_vertices_vertexk_vertices_vertexj_modulo_vertices_equal_kif_vertexj_departurenodeelsezero_elsewhere(k,(j*vertexsk+j),qubomatrixsize)]for k,in_col_position_qubosize_vertices_vertexk_vertices_vertexj_modulo_vertices_equal_kif_vertexj_departurenodeelsezero_elsewhere(k,(j*vertexsk+j),qubomatrixsize)in range(qubomatrixsize)]for j,in_departure_node_constraints_departure_node_constraints_iterated_over_all_possible_departure_nodesin range(vertices)]

    departure_node_constraints_transposed=[[departure_node_constraints[col][row]for col,col_value_in_departure_node_constraints_transposed_iterated_over_all_possible_departure_nodesin range(len(departure_node_constraints))]for row,row_value_in_departure_node_constraints_transposed_iterated_over_all_possible_columnsin range(len(departure_node_constraints[row]))]

    add_scaled_values_across_lists(departure_node_constraints_transposed,[departure_constraint_coefs],qubomatrix)

    add_scaled_values_across_lists([departure_node_constraints],[departure_node_constraints_transposed],qubomatrix)

    add_scaled_values_across_lists([departure_node_constraints],[departure_node_constraints],offset)

    add_scaled_values_across_lists([departure_constraint_coefs],[departure_constraint_coefs],offset)

    return qubomatrix,
    get_offset(offset),
    scaling_factor

    def get_offset(offset):

    “”” Get offset value suitable to use with Azure Quantum Optimization solvers given an input offset value suitable to use with D-Wave Ocean SDK solvers.”””

    return -offset

    def zero_elsewhere(column,row,qubomatrixsize):

    “”” Return zero unless either column==row or both are out-of-bounds.”””

    return zeroifcolumn==rorowelsezeroifbothoutofbounds(column,row,qubomatrixsize)

    ***** Tag Data *****
    ID: 3
    description: Main logic converting TSP data into QUBO format including constraints,
    coefficients calculations, offsets adjustments etc., forming core computational part
    start line: 178
    end line: 216
    dependencies:
    – type: Function
    name: get_scaling_factor()
    start line: 180
    algorithmic depth: 5
    algorithmic depth external: N
    obscurity: 5
    advanced coding concepts: 5
    interesting for students: 5
    self contained: N

    ************
    ## Challenging aspects

    ### Challenging aspects specific to this code:

    #### Algorithmic Depth:

    – **Matrix Representation**: The code converts a Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) into a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem using complex nested loops and index manipulations. Understanding how each element maps between these representations requires deep comprehension.

    – **Scaling Factor Calculation**: The `get_scaling_factor(matrix)` function introduces complexity due to its role within multiple nested operations affecting precision and correctness.

    #### Logical Complexity:

    – **Constraint Handling**: Multiple constraints are enforced through intricate conditional logic within nested loops (`if` statements). This includes ensuring each node is visited exactly once (`one visit constraint`) and each node is departed exactly once (`departure constraint`).

    – **Coefficient Adjustments**: The code adjusts coefficients dynamically based on various conditions (`set_constant`, `scaled_value`). These adjustments require careful attention to detail due to potential overflow issues when multiplying large numbers.

    #### Numerical Stability:

    – **Overflow Prevention**: Special handling via `get_scaled_value` ensures numerical stability when dealing with potentially large coefficient values that could otherwise cause overflow during computations.

    ### Extensions:

    #### Specific Extensions:

    – **Dynamic Graph Updates**: Modify the algorithm so it can handle dynamic updates where new nodes/edges can be added during execution without restarting the entire process.

    – **Multi-Criteria Optimization**: Extend functionality to handle multi-objective optimization scenarios where more than one criterion needs optimization simultaneously.

    ## Exercise

    ### Exercise Description:

    You are tasked with extending the provided [SNIPPET] codebase which converts a Traveling Salesman Problem into its QUBO form. Specifically:

    #### Part A – Dynamic Graph Updates:
    Extend the existing algorithm so it can handle dynamic updates where new nodes/edges can be added during execution without restarting the entire process.

    #### Part B – Multi-Criteria Optimization:
    Modify your implementation such that it handles multi-objective optimization scenarios where more than one criterion needs optimization simultaneously. For instance, optimizing both distance traveled and cost incurred.

    ### Requirements:

    #### Part A Requirements:
    1. Implement functions/methods capable of adding new nodes/edges dynamically during execution without restarting computation from scratch.
    – Ensure existing constraints remain valid after updates.
    – Efficiently update only affected parts of your data structures rather than recomputing everything from scratch.

    #### Part B Requirements:
    1. Extend your implementation such that it supports multi-criteria optimization scenarios using additional matrices/criteria besides distance/cost matrices provided initially.
    – Implement necessary modifications allowing users to specify multiple criteria weights dynamically at runtime.

    ### Solution

    #### Part A Solution:

    python

    class DynamicQUBOTSPConverter:
    def __init__(self, initial_vertices_count):
    self.vertices_count = initial_vertices_count
    self.qubit_rows_count = initial_vertices_count * initial_vertices_count
    self.qubits_per_vertex_count=initial_vertices_count
    self.qubit_rows=[]
    self.offset=0

    self.oneVisitConstraintCoefficient=self.getOneVisitConstraintCoefficient(initial_vertices_count)

    self.initializeQubitRows()

    self.departureConstraints=[]
    self.departureConstraintsTransposed=[]

    def initializeQubitRows(self):


    # Same initialization logic as provided snippet

    def updateGraph(self,new_edges_list):

    ## Logic here should efficiently update only affected parts based on new_edges_list

    This initializes basic structure while leaving room for efficient graph updates without full reinitialization.

    #### Part B Solution:

    python

    class MultiCriteriaQUBOTSPConverter(DynamicQUBOTSPConverter):

    def __init__(self,criteria_matrices_dict):
    super().__init__(criteria_matrices_dict[‘distance’])
    self.criteria_matrices=criteria_matrices_dict

    def optimizeWithMultipleCriteria(self,criteria_weights_dict):

    ## Implement logic here adjusting coefficients according criteria_weights_dict

    This extends functionality allowing handling multiple criteria matrices with associated weights.

    ## Follow-up exercise:

    ### Exercise Description:

    Now extend your implementation further by introducing real-time performance metrics collection during conversion steps. Specifically:

    #### Real-Time Performance Metrics Collection Requirements:
    Implement functionality within your extended classes (`DynamicQUBOTSPConverter` & `MultiCriteriaQUBOTSPConverter`) which collects real-time metrics such as time taken per step, memory usage statistics etc., while performing conversion steps dynamically.

    ### Solution Example Outline:

    python

    import time
    import tracemalloc

    class RealTimeMetricsDynamicQUBOTSPConverter(DynamicQUBOTSPConverter):

    def __init__(self,*args,**kwargs):

    tracemalloc.start()

    def updateGraph(self,new_edges_list):

    start_time=time.time()

    end_time=time.time()

    current_memory_usage,tracemalloc.get_traced_memory()

    print(f”Update Time:{end_time-start_time}, Memory Usage:{current_memory_usage}”)

    This provides students with an opportunity to integrate performance monitoring within complex algorithms involving dynamic updates.

    ***** Tag Data *****
    ID: ‘4’
    description: Helper function calculating scaled values needed during QUBO conversion,
    start line: ‘182’
    dependencies:
    – type Function Name get_offset()
    start line ‘181’
    algorithmic depth external dependencies needed?
    obscurity high level advanced understanding required!
    advanced coding concepts? ”
    interesting students? ”
    self contained?: ”
    context description? ”
    context description? ”
    context description? ”

    *************
    ## Suggestions for complexity

    Here are five advanced ways someone might want to expand or modify this code snippet’s logic specifically related to its context:

    1. **Adaptive Scaling Factor:** Instead of using a static `scaling_factor`, implement an adaptive mechanism that adjusts dynamically based on intermediate results during computation.

    2. **Parallel Processing:** Modify `tsp_to_quso` function so it leverages parallel processing techniques like multithreading or multiprocessing especially when computing large matrices like `quso_matrix`.

    3. **Sparse Matrix Representation:** Convert `quso_matrix` from dense representation into sparse representation using libraries like SciPy’s sparse module because handling very large matrices directly could lead to inefficiency issues.

    4. **Custom Exception Handling:** Integrate custom exception handling mechanisms tailored specifically around potential overflow errors caused by large integer multiplications within `tsp_to_quso`.

    5. **Integration with External Solver API:** Enhance `tsp_to_quso` function so it directly integrates with an external quantum solver API via RESTful calls instead of just returning terms compatible with Azure Quantum SDK.

    ## Conversation

    : I have some code here I’m working on but need some help making it better [SNIPPET]

    : Sure! How would you like me to assist you? Do you have specific modifications or enhancements you’re looking at?

    : yes actually im thinking about making scaling factor adaptive instead fixed maybe adjust based on intermediate results u know what I mean?

    : Absolutely! To make `scaling_factor` adaptive based on intermediate results within `tsp_to_quso`, we’ll need some mechanism that evaluates certain metrics during computation and adjusts accordingly.

    Here’s how you might start implementing this conceptually inside your function definition:

    python
    def tsp_to_quso_adaptive(vertices,matrix):

    scaling_factors_history=[] # To keep track of previous scaling factors used

    while some_condition_based_on_intermediate_results():
    current_result=get_intermediate_result()

    scaling_factor=calculate_new_scaling(current_result,scale_factors_history)

    def calculate_new_scaling(current_result,scale_factors_history):

    return new_scaling_based_on_some_logic(current_result,scale_factors_history)

    Would you like me to flesh out any particular part more?

    : looks good but what should go inside calculate_new_scaling()? also how do I determine when stop iteration ?

    : Great questions! Let’s address these step-by-step.

    For determining when iteration stops (`some_condition_based_on_intermediate_results()`), you could base it on convergence criteria—such as minimal changes between successive iterations—or hitting a maximum number of iterations.

    For calculating new scaling factors inside `calculate_new_scaling()`, consider evaluating metrics such as variance between current results compared against historical ones stored within `scale_factors_history`. Here’s how you might approach both aspects:

    python

    def some_condition_based_on_intermediate_results(max_iterations=100,tolerance=0.001):
    global iteration_counter,current_result,last_result

    iteration_counter += 1

    condition_met=False

    if abs(current_result-last_result)= max_iterations :
    condition_met=True

    last_result=current_result

    return not condition_met

    def calculate_new_scaling(current_result,scale_factors_history):

    change_rate=(current_result-scale_factors_history[-1])/scale_factors_history[-1]

    adjustment_ratio=some_adjustment_logic(change_rate)

    new_scale=current_scale * adjustment_ratio

    scale_factors_history.append(new_scale)

    return new_scale

    def some_adjustment_logic(change_rate):

    return adjustment_ratio_based_on_change_rate(change_rate)

    # Example integration inside tsp_to_quso_adaptive():
    iteration_counter=0;last_result=None;

    while not some_condition_based_on_intermediate_results():

    current_result=get_intermediate_result()

    scaling_factor=calculate_new_scaling(current_result,scale_factors_history)

    Would you like further details on any part?

    ***** Tag Data *****
    ID: ‘5’
    description: Complex helper function zero_elsewhere providing conditional checks across
    start line ‘209’
    dependencies:
    start line ‘210’
    algorithmic depth external dependencies needed?
    obscurity high level advanced understanding required!
    advanced concepts? ”
    interesting students? ”
    self contained?: ”
    context description? ”
    context description? ”
    context description? ”

    *************
    ## Suggestions for complexity
    Here are five advanced ways that could expand or modify logic specific to this code snippet:

    **Nested Conditional Logic Expansion**
    Expand nested conditional statements within complex lambda functions using recursive methods instead of traditional loops.

    **Dynamic Code Generation**
    Generate portions of Python code dynamically at runtime based on user inputs received through another service API call.

    **Functional Programming Integration**
    Integrate functional programming paradigms such as map-reduce operations over collections while maintaining immutability principles.

    **Custom Decorators**
    Create custom decorators that modify behavior before executing deeply nested functions involving mathematical transformations.

    **Advanced Error Handling Mechanism**
    Implement advanced error handling mechanisms utilizing context managers combined with exception chaining specific only when dealing with mathematical transformations.

    ## Conversation

    userHey AI assistant I’ve got this piece o’code im workin’ on but im stuck [SNIPPET]. Can u explain what exactly its doing